83% of UK consumers, 78% of Czech consumers, and 92% of French consumers want method of production labelling, which clearly identifies the farm system used to produce the food, extended to meat and dairy products. Almost as many (UK: 79%, CZ: 60%, and FR: 80%), said farm animal welfare was important when deciding which food products to buy.
- To read this international news release as a pdf - Click here
- To read the UK version of this news release (pdf) - Click here
- Pro přečtení této tiskové zprávy v češtině (pdf) – Klikněte zde
- Pour lire la version française de cette actualité (pdf) – Cliquer ici
The research was commissioned by Labelling Matters, a joint project of Compassion in World Farming (CIWF), RSPCA, Soil Association and World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA), and is the one of the most comprehensive to have taken place on animal welfare-related food labelling in Europe. It found that the welfare of farm animals was an important factor when choosing food and that there is a strong demand by French shoppers for mandatory method of production labelling.
Julia Wrathall, Head of Farm Animals at the RSPCA, said, 'Despite clear method of production labelling of eggs and new EU legislation to label fish by method of catch, consumers are still kept in the dark about the farm systems used to produce the vast majority of their meat and dairy products.'
Method of production labelling has been legally required for eggs sold in the EU since 20041. Since then all eggs sold in shells have had to be labelled as 'eggs from caged hens', 'barn eggs', 'free range', or 'organic'. This simple change has dramatically increased the number of eggs produced in cage-free systems2. Method of catch labelling for fish was agreed by the EU in June 20133.
Julia Wrathall said, 'It can be extremely difficult for consumers trying to buy higher welfare products. So many meat and dairy labels use misleading language and images to suggest good welfare even when the animals have been reared in standard intensive systems. As we have seen with eggs, consumers have the power to drive improvements in farm systems, but they can only do this if there is honest, comparable information on products they buy.'
In 2010 the UK's Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) carried out its own study, recording the opinions of just 96 people4. The study concluded that labelling would have a limited effect on purchasing behaviours. Unfortunately this study has been disproportionately influential – used by both Defra and the European Commission to oppose method of production labelling. These new figures highlight that consumers do want honest labelling of meat and dairy products.
Philip Lymbery, Chief Executive of Compassion in World Farming, said, 'It's astonishing that Defra and European Commission are still resisting clear, objective method of production labelling of meat and dairy products.
'UK Farming Minister, David Heath, has repeatedly claimed that method of production labelling is too complicated, that good welfare can be achieved even in the most barren and intensive systems, and that labelling is not a sufficiently important influence on consumer behaviour.
'The Labelling Matters research recorded the opinions of thirty-times more consumers than Defra's study. It directly contradicts the government's position.'
The research also investigated consumer support for the specific poultry meat labelling terms, proposed by Labelling Matters: intensive indoor, extensive indoor, free range, and organic. More than three-quarters of respondents said they would use these terms.
The majority of chickens reared for meat in the EU are housed in intensive systems, which can have a detrimental effect on their welfare including lameness and heart and lung failure. With around 90% of chickens being intensively reared it can be very difficult for people to find a higher welfare option when they shop for food. These figures prove that people want honest, objective labelling of poultry meat, and of all meat and dairy products.
For more information - please get in touch
Notes to editors:
* QA Research findings:
All figures, unless otherwise stated, are from QA Research. Total sample size was 3,003 adults across the UK, Czech Republic and France (1,001 in each country). Fieldwork was undertaken in April and May 2013. The survey was carried out online via consumer access panels. The figures have been weighted and are representative of all adults (aged 16+).
Key EU figures:
- 83% of UK consumers answered that method of production labelling, based on the egg model, should definitely or probably be extended to all meat and dairy products. In the Czech Republic it was 78%, and in France it was 92% of consumers.
- 79% of UK respondents answered that animal welfare is very important or quite important to them when deciding which meat and dairy products to buy. In the Czech Republic it was 60%, and in France it was 80% of consumers.
- 73% of UK respondents thought that method of production labelling terms, like those which exist for eggs, definitely or usually provide clear information for them to make an informed choice. In the Czech Republic it was 70%, and in France it was 82% of consumers.
- 88% agree strongly or slightly that they would be happy to see more information on food packaging if they felt the information was useful to them. In the Czech Republic it was 84%, and in France it was 90% of consumers.
Helen Browning, Chief Executive of the Soil Association, said, 'Clear, honest labelling of meat and dairy produce is crucial if the European Commission is to make good on its ambition for the market to drive improvements in farm animal welfare.
'Method of production labelling is not about telling people what to buy – it's about giving them a straightforward choice. The best products for welfare, including organic, are often already labelled. But until the rest are too, consumers are left to hope or assume that everything else on the shelf was produced just as humanely. Making clear the reality – for example that around 90% of chickens and pigs reared for meat in the EU are housed in intensive systems– is fairer for consumers and for those farmers working to higher welfare standards.'
World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA):
Lesley Lambert, Chief Policy Advisor at WSPA said, 'More than four-fifths of consumers in each country said they wanted to see method of production labelling extended to all meat and dairy products. More than two-thirds thought that method of production labelling terms provided clear information. When asked about specific labelling terms for poultry meat (intensive indoor, extensive indoor, free range, and organic) more than three-quarters said they would use them.
'Importantly, more than four-fifths of consumers made it clear that they were happy to see more information on food packaging, and a similar number said they wanted this information to be clear and visible on the front of the pack so it's easy to see.'
1. Method of production labelling of shell eggs was introduced across the EU in 2004. Under the scheme all eggs and egg packaging must be labelled, 0 = Organic, 1 = Free range, 2 = Barn eggs, or 3 = Eggs from caged hens.
2. In the UK, production of cage-free shell eggs in 2011 reached 51% of the total egg market, up from 31% in 2003. 5 The trend across the same period was also significant in other EU nations, for example, a 57% increase in the total percentage of cage-free egg production in Austria, 24% in Italy and 57% in Germany.
3. Source: Europa: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/pressroom/content/20130605IPR11103/html/Agreement-on-marketing-rules-for-fisheries-products
4. Source: Defra: http://randd.defra.gov.uk/Default.aspx?Menu=Menu&Module=More&Location=None&Completed=0&ProjectID=17379